In fact this claim has been elevated to the level of dogma in American intellectual culture. The reason I know this is considered unquestionable dogma is the reaction I get when I call it into question. You just met me! How do you know what I can do?
The likelihood of a supreme being creating Earth and judging the deeds of humankind has been a topic of debate since the dawn of humanity.
Atheists frequently state the fact that there is no factual proof that God is real is itself the evidence that no such being exists.
However, the proponents of creationism and monotheism introduce plausible arguments, which may be not factual, but still possess a significantly persuasive component.
Members of religious groups hold up their holy books as evidence of a divine power.
The issue here is that there is little proof the events detailed in these books actually happened. Some scholars state certain biblical events can be proven to be false. Even if religious texts were backed up by science and history, this alone would not be sufficient evidence that everything that is included in them is factual.
Atheists cannot use inaccuracies in holy books as proof that God does not exist, as it is possible that such a god exists who has never been mentioned in religious texts.
It is also possible that these books have been corrupted over a period of time, but still have elements of truth in them. However, Hewatt expresses the view that this is more likely to be due to evolution. It would only be possible to prove that it existed if it wished its presence to be known.
This means it is impossible to say whether the existence of God could be proven without knowing whether God wants people to know it is real Castor Religious texts cannot be said to act as adequate proof that God exists, but cannot be used to disprove its existence either.
The only way its existence could be proven would be if it desired humankind to prove its existence. If this was to occur, it could be argued that it would be a case of God revealing itself to humans as opposed to humans proving its existence. Owl Beard Press, Proving Does God Exist Essay - That’s how the human race began.
The bible will inform you on the whole situation. Most people say the bible is just a book of a story. The bible is so much more than that. - Proof Of The Exsistence of God Either God exists or He doesn't. There is no middle ground. Any attempt to remain neutral in.
This proves the thesis of this essay that we don’t need proof of God existence. People are diverse and will therefore always have different opinions on whether God exists or not. As such, existence of God is not a matter of discussion. Nov 12, · Does God Exist Debate Philosophy Essay.
Print Reference this. Disclaimer: Until proven wrong David Hume is a philosopher who has never believed that God exists. He uses quite a few reasons to criticize the five arguments that Thomas Aquinas has used to prove that there is a person called god in world.
If you are the original. Popular Arguments For The Existence Of God The Ontological Argument One of the most important attempts to demonstrate the existence of God is the ontological argument of Saint Anselm, an 11th-century theologian.
The theistic worldview is established by necessarily proving that ‘The Theistic God exists’. Once this is done, then there are only three religions left to decide from: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
Objections and alleged disproofs. Objections to these above proofs Alleged disproofs. An essay or paper on God's Existence. The quandary of the existence of God has troubled mankind for thousands of years. The existence of God was once never denied, as His presence, His existence was evident in miracles and the people"s faith.